Thermal Surgical, LLC v. Brown
Thermal Surgical, LLC |
Jeff Brown |
Medtronic, Inc. |
2:2024cv02294 |
May 6, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Sheryl H Lipman |
Tu M Pham |
Contract: Other |
05 U.S.C. ยง 704 Labor Litigation |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ANSWER to Writ of Garnishment by Medtronic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(jae) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Administrative track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
Filing 3 WRIT of of Execution issued. Filer is responsible for downloading and serving writ. (jae) (Main Document 3 replaced on 5/8/2024) (jae). |
Filing 2 Chief Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jae) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Garnishment (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATNWDC-4407258), filed by Thermal Surgical, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Writ of Execution - Form 2, #2 Exhibit U.S. Marshal Form 285 - CWC Signed, #3 Exhibit Certified Copy of Dist. of Vermont Judgment, #4 Exhibit Summons and Notice to Garnishee - Form 3, #5 Exhibit Notice to Garnishee - Employer - Form 4, #6 Exhibit Answer of Garnishee - Employer for Wages & Salary - Form 5, #7 Exhibit Notice of Judgment Debtor - Form 6)(Cardwell, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.