Kiner v. Shelby County
| Rev Gerald Kiner |
| Shelby County |
| Michael Forbess |
| 2:2024cv02884 |
| November 14, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Thomas L Parker |
| Tu M Pham |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 SUR REPLY by Gerald Kiner re #12 Reply to Response to Motion to dismiss and for sanctions. (jae) |
| Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 Response in Opposition to Motion to consolidate filed by Gerald Kiner. (jae) |
| Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Shelby County. (Frazier, Katherine) |
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Chandler, Raven) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Consolidate Cases and Request for Sanctions filed by Gerald Kiner. (mf) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Gerald Kiner. (jae) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Consolidate Cases Proposed Order Submitted by Shelby County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Frazier, Katherine) |
| Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum In Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Chandler, Raven) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine L. Frazier on behalf of Shelby County (Frazier, Katherine) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Stay Proceedings and Notice of Pending State Court Motion by Gerald Kiner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(jae) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 2 Judge Thomas L. Parker and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jae) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Chancery Court of Tennessee for the Thirtieth Judicial District, case number CH-24-1418 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATNWDC-4548751), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(Chandler, Raven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
