Green v. Shelby County Division of Correction et al
Antonio Green |
Sarah Washington, Reece Walker, Tgichona Baldwin and Shelby County Division of Correction |
2:2024cv03001 |
December 16, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Samuel H Mays |
Tu M Pham |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 5 MOTION and Request for Court to Seve the Defendant's copy of complaint filed by Antonio Green. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(cmm) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Antonio Green. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(cmm) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Antonio Green. (Attachments: #1 trust fund statement)(jae) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights Under 42 USC 1983 against Tgichona Baldwin, Shelby County Division of Correction, Reece Walker, Sarah Washington, filed by Antonio Green. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 envelope)(jae) |
Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-01 case reassigned to Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham. (jae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.