Pierce v. Saul
Plaintiff: Raquel Pierce
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul
Case Number: 1:2019cv00502
Filed: October 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:402
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Raquel Pierce. (Dewberry, Donald)
October 16, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Donald Dewberry on behalf of Raquel Pierce. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-7480392. (Dewberry, Donald)
October 16, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Raquel Pierce. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Dewberry, Donald)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pierce v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raquel Pierce
Represented By: Donald Dewberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?