Starr Indemnity & Liability Company v. M&M Air Service of Beaumont, Inc.
| Starr Indemnity & Liability Company |
| M&M Air Service of Beaumont, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00375 |
| September 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Michael J Truncale |
| Airplane Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Airline Crash |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/2/2023 at 9:00 AM and Jury Selection/Trial set for 11/6/2023 at 9:00 AM in Ctrm 2 (Beaumont) before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 11/1/22. (tkd, )
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Michael J. Truncale: Case Management Conference held on 11/1/2022. Attorneys present: David Parrish Robert Caplan (via telephone), Stuart Brown Jr. Court will enter scheduling order. (Court Reporter None.) (jmv, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Robert Caplan on behalf of Starr Indemnity & Liability Company. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9200219. (Caplan, Robert) |
| Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Swaim, Gary) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/17/2022: #1 Proposed Scheduling Order) (bjc, ). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by M&M Air Service of Beaumont, Inc of Compliance with Service of Its Initial Disclosures to Plaintiff (Brown, Stuart) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER directing the parties to conduct a Rule 26(f) attorney conference by 10/3/22. Rule 16 Case Management/Scheduling Conference set for 11/1/2022 at 11:30 AM before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 9/12/22. (tkd, )
|
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (tkd, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (tkd, ) |
| Filing 4 ORIGINAL ANSWER (filed in state court) to #3 Original Petition, filed by M&M Air Service of Beaumont, Inc..(tkd, ) |
| Filing 3 ORIGINAL PETITION (filed in state court) against M&M Air Service of Beaumont, Inc., filed by Starr Indemnity & Liability Company.(tkd, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Starr Indemnity & Liability Company. (tkd, ) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by M&M Air Service of Beaumont, Inc. (Brown, Stuart) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by M&M Air Service of Beaumont, Inc. from 136th Judicial District, case number D-210124. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9119062), filed by M&M Air Service of Beaumont, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Index of Removal Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A-1 - Pl. Original Petition, #3 Exhibit A-2 - Citation, #4 Exhibit A-3 - Def. Original Answer, #5 Exhibit A-4 - Docket Sheet, #6 Exhibit B - List of Counsel, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(Brown, Stuart) (Attachments 7 and 8 replaced with flattened images on 9/12/2022) (tkd, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
