Centocor, Inc. et al v. Abbott Laboratories
| Centocor, Inc. and New York University |
| Abbott Laboratories |
| Abbott Laboratories |
| Centocor, Inc. and New York University |
| 2:2007cv00139 |
| April 16, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| T. John Ward |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
329
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court finds that Abbott has not carried its burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the 775 patent is unenforceable or invalid. The Court finds that Abbott has not proven by clear and convincing evid ence that Centocor committed inequitable conduct or prosecution laches during prosecution of the applications in the 775 patent family. The Court further finds that Abbott has not proven by clear and convincing evidence that the claim term 28 competitively inhibits of the 775 patent is invalid for indefiniteness. Thus, the Court finds that the 775 patent is not invalid or unenforceable and therefore rules in favor of Centocor. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 11/4/09. (ehs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
