Anu IP, LLC v. Provantage LLC Featured Case
Plaintiff: Anu IP LLC
Defendant: Provantage LLC
Case Number: 2:2012cv00236
Filed: April 18, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Marshall Office
County: Harrison
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Presiding Judge: Roy S Payne
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2012 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Provantage LLC ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0540-3546856.), filed by Anu IP, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - US Patent No. 6,979,210, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet attachment)(Spangler, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anu IP, LLC v. Provantage LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anu IP LLC
Represented By: James A Fussell, III
Represented By: Andrew W. Spangler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Provantage LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?