Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
| Uniloc Luxembourg S.A., Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc 2017, LLC |
| Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon Digital Services, LLC and Amazon Digital Services, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv00289 |
| July 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| Collin |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 30 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jeffrey Randall Roeser on behalf of All Defendants (Roeser, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 29 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jennifer Haltom Doan on behalf of All Defendants (Doan, Jennifer) |
Filing 28
CONSOLIDATION ORDER granting #26 Motion to Consolidate Cases. CONSOLIDATES Case Nos. 2:18-CV-00289 and 2:18-CV-00290 for all purposes, including trial. The Court designates Case No. 2:18-CV-00289 as the lead case, and the parties should make all filings in that lead case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 8/13/18. (ch, )
|
|
Filing 27
ORDER granting #25 Motion to Stay Deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 8/13/2018. (ch, )
|
| Filing 26 Joint MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Uniloc 2017, LLC, Uniloc Luxembourg S.A., Uniloc USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Etheridge, James) |
| Filing 25 Joint MOTION to Stay by Uniloc 2017, LLC, Uniloc Luxembourg S.A., Uniloc USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Etheridge, James) |
| Filing 24 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Uniloc 2017, LLC, Uniloc Luxembourg S.A., Uniloc USA, Inc.. Amazon Digital Services, LLC served on 7/18/2018, answer due 9/7/2018; Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc. served on 7/18/2018, answer due 9/7/2018; Amazon.com, Inc. served on 7/18/2018, answer due 9/7/2018. (Loveless, Ryan) |
| Filing 23 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Amazon Digital Services, Inc., Amazon Digital Services, LLC, Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. (Merrill, William) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Daniel J Shih on behalf of All Defendants (Shih, Daniel) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ian Bradford Crosby on behalf of All Defendants (Crosby, Ian) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Justin Adatto Nelson on behalf of All Defendants (Nelson, Justin) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Designation of Attorney in Charge to Max Lalon Tribble, Jr on behalf of All Defendants (Tribble, Max) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by William Randolph Merrill on behalf of All Defendants (Merrill, William) |
| Filing 17 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc..( Merrill, William) |
| Filing 16 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Amazon Digital Services, LLC.( Merrill, William) |
| Filing 15 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Amazon.com, Inc..( Merrill, William) |
| Filing 14 Defendants' Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Amazon Digital Services, Inc.; and Amazon Web Services, Inc..( Merrill, William) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc. to 9/7/2018. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Amazon Digital Services, LLC to 9/7/2018. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Amazon.com, Inc. to 9/7/2018. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Amazon Digital Services, Inc. to 9/7/2018; Amazon Web Services, Inc. to 9/7/2018. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| ***FILED IN ERROR. FILE SEPARATE APPLICATION Document # 13, Unopposed Application for Extension of Time. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (ch, ) |
| Filing 13 ***FILED IN ERROR***Defendants' Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Amazon Digital Services, Inc., Amazon Digital Services, LLC, Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., Amazon Web Services, Inc., and Amazon.com, Inc..( Merrill, William) Modified on 8/7/2018 (ch, ). |
| Filing 12 ***FILED IN ERROR***Defendants' Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Amazon Digital Services, Inc., Amazon Digital Services, LLC, Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., Amazon Web Services, Inc., and Amazon.com, Inc..( Merrill, William) Modified on 8/6/2018 (ch, ). |
| ***FILED IN ERROR. FIRST APPLICATION CAN NOT BE OVER 30 DAYS Document # 12, Unopposed Application for Extension of Time. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (ch, ) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Uniloc 2017, LLC, Uniloc Luxembourg S.A., Uniloc USA, Inc.. Amazon Web Services, Inc. served on 7/18/2018, answer due 8/8/2018. (Loveless, Ryan) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Uniloc 2017, LLC, Uniloc Luxembourg S.A., Uniloc USA, Inc.. Amazon Digital Services, Inc. served on 7/18/2018, answer due 8/8/2018. (Loveless, Ryan) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/19/2018. (ch, )
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued as to Amazon Digital Services, Inc., Amazon Digital Services, LLC, Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es), #2 Summons(es), #3 Summons(es), #4 Summons(es))(ch, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jeffrey Huang on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Huang, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Travis Lee Richins on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Richins, Travis) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Brett Aaron Mangrum on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Mangrum, Brett) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Designation of Attorney in Charge to James L Etheridge on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Etheridge, James) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Loveless, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ryan Scott Loveless on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Loveless, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT of Patent Infringement against Amazon Digital Services, Inc., Amazon Digital Services, LLC, Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-6854065.), filed by Uniloc 2017, LLC, Uniloc Luxembourg S.A., Uniloc USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - '890, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Etheridge, James) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (nkl, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
