LILES v. WEILAND - KESSLER, LLC
| JAMES LILES |
| WEILAND - KESSLER, LLC |
| 2:2019cv00055 |
| February 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Defendant's Original ANSWER to #1 Complaint Plaintiff's by WEILAND - KESSLER, LLC.(Comte, Steven) |
| Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re WEILAND - KESSLER, LLC.( Comte, Steven) |
| Filing 5 ***FILED IN ERROR***Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re WEILAND - KESSLER, LLC.( Comte, Steven) Modified on 3/12/2019 (ch, ). |
| ***FILED IN ERROR. APPLICATION IS BLANK Document # 5, Application for Extension of Time. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (ch, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for WEILAND - KESSLER, LLC to 4/11/2019. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| ***FILED IN ERROR. FILE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Document # 4, Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (ch, ) |
| Filing 4 ***FILED IN ERROR***Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by WEILAND - KESSLER, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Extension to File Answer)(Comte, Steven) Modified on 3/12/2019 (ch, ). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JAMES LILES. WEILAND - KESSLER, LLC served on 2/19/2019, answer due 3/12/2019. (Negem, Jimmy) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to WEILAND - KESSLER, LLC. (ch, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WEILAND - KESSLER, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7141381.), filed by JAMES LILES. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET)(Negem, Jimmy) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LILES v. WEILAND - KESSLER, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WEILAND - KESSLER, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Steven Wade Comte |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JAMES LILES | |
| Represented By: | Jimmy Michael Negem |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
