Sgromo v. Scott et al
| Pietro Pasquale Antonio Sgromo, Peter Anthony Sgromo and Pietro Pasquale Antoni Sgromo |
| Leonard Gregory Scott and Eureka Inventions LLC |
| 2:2019cv00231 |
| June 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 0010 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court or to Transfer to N.D. Cal. filed by Pietro Pasquale Antoni Sgromo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit DECL #1 OF PPASGROMO, #2 Exhibit DECL. EXH. 1 - LTA, #3 Exhibit DECL. EXH. 2 - INVEST IN ERKA, #4 Exhibit DECL. EXH. 3 - SGROMO CONSULT FOR SCOTT, #5 Exhibit DECL. EXH. 4 - SGROMO PRE SALARY, #6 Exhibit DECL. EXH. 5 - SCOTT SGRO INVEST DISC, #7 Exhibit DECL. EXH. 6 - WEM BSTWY 440 DEAL MEMO, #8 Exhibit DECL. EXH. 7 - BSTWY ERKA 440 AGMNT, #9 Exhibit DECL. EXH. 8 - BSTWY ERKA SLIDE AGMNT)(Sgromo, Pietro) |
Filing 10
ORDER re #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court or to Transfer to N.D. Cal. filed by Leonard Gregory Scott, #9 Stipulation filed by Leonard Gregory Scott. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 7/26/2019. (ch, ) (order sent regular mail)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION re #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court or to Transfer to N.D. Cal. and Order to Extend Due Date of Response by Leonard Gregory Scott. (Moore, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Remand to State Court or to Transfer to N.D. Cal. by Leonard Gregory Scott. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Moore Declaration, #2 Exhibit 1 to the Moore Decl, #3 Exhibit 2 to the Moore Decl, #4 Exhibit 3 to the Moore Decl, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(Moore, Thomas) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/8/2019. (ch, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER assigning case to Judge Payne by consent of the parties for all further proceedings and entry of judgment. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/3/2019. (ch, )
|
| Filing 5 CONSENT to Proceed Before US Magistrate Judge by Eureka Inventions LLC, Leonard Gregory Scott, Pietro Pasquale Antonio Sgromo. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Thomas E. Moore, III on behalf of All Defendants. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-7335834. (Moore, Thomas) |
| (MAILED TO PLAINTIFF REGULAR MAIL) In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) Modified on 6/20/2019 (ch, ). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Pietro Pasquale Antonio Sgromo. (ch, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Pietro Pasquale Antonio Sgromo from Superior Court of the State of California, case number CPF - 19-516663., filed by Pietro Pasquale Antonio Sgromo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit A-D)(ch, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/19/2019: #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (ch, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
