National Products Inc. v. RailBlaza Ltd.
National Products Inc. |
RailBlaza Ltd. |
2:2020cv00228 |
July 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Roy S Payne |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Jeffrey M Rollings on behalf of RailBlaza Ltd.. Filing fee $ 100. Receipt number: 0540-7949792 (saenz, ) |
Filing 12 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re RailBlaza Ltd..( Golden, Robert) |
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for RailBlaza Ltd. to 9/10/2020. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Robert B. Golden on behalf of RailBlaza Ltd.. Filing fee $ 100. (saenz, ) |
Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Robert B. Golden; Fee: $100, receipt number: 0540-794445 (saenz, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (nkl, ) |
***FILED IN ERROR - please file an application for extension of time to answer complaint before filing a motion for extension of time. Document # 10, First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (nkl, ) |
Filing 10 FILED IN ERROR First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint by RailBlaza Ltd.. (Mikeska, Lucas) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/11/2020: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (nkl, ). Modified on 8/13/2020 (nkl, ). |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Accompanying Documents - Civil Cover Sheet; NPI's Demand for Trial by Jury; and NPI's Corporate Disclosure Statement served on Ross Pratt, Director of Railblaza Ltd. on 7/21/2020, filed by National Products Inc.. (McMichael, Jonathan) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Charles Smith on behalf of National Products Inc. (Smith, Michael) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued as to RailBlaza Ltd.. (nkl, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (nkl, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jessica Andrea Martinez Kaempf on behalf of National Products Inc. (Kaempf, Jessica) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Thomas McMichael on behalf of National Products Inc. (McMichael, Jonathan) |
Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by National Products Inc.. (Tellekson, David) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by National Products Inc. (Tellekson, David) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Tellekson, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against RailBlaza Ltd. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7873327.), filed by National Products Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - US7523904, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tellekson, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.