Viking Technologies, LLC v. Assurant, Inc.
| Viking Technologies, LLC |
| Assurant, Inc. |
| Asurion, LLC, uBreakiFix Co., Teleplan Holding USA, Inc., Teleplan Service Solutions Inc., Clover Wireless, LLC, Reconext LLC and Clover Technologies Group, LLC |
| 2:2020cv00357 |
| November 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Viking Technologies, LLC (PR 3-1, 3-2 Disclosures) (Henry, Claire) |
Filing 22
ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 1/20/2021 09:00 AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 12/22/2020. (ch, )
|
| Filing 21 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Teleplan Holding USA, Inc..( Disbennett, Patrick) |
| Filing 20 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Clover Wireless, LLC.( Disbennett, Patrick) |
| Filing 19 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Clover Technologies Group, LLC.( Disbennett, Patrick) |
| Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Clover Wireless, LLC to 1/15/2021. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Clover Technologies Group, LLC to 1/15/2021. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Teleplan Holding USA, Inc. to 1/15/2021. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Assurant, Inc. to 1/15/2021. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 18 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Assurant, Inc..( Cox, Brady) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Patrick Brett Disbennett on behalf of Clover Technologies Group, LLC, Clover Wireless, LLC, Teleplan Holding USA, Inc. (Disbennett, Patrick) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mark Edward Turk on behalf of Clover Technologies Group, LLC, Clover Wireless, LLC, Teleplan Holding USA, Inc. (Turk, Mark) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mark E. Ferguson on behalf of Asurion, LLC, uBreakiFix Co. (Ferguson, Mark) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael John Valaik on behalf of Asurion, LLC, uBreakiFix Co. (Valaik, Michael) |
|
Filing 13
CONSOLIDATION ORDER - The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:20-cv- 00357. All parties are instructed to file any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 12/16/2020. (ch, )
|
| Filing 12 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Assurant, Inc.(Cox, Brady) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Assurant, Inc. to 12/31/2020. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Elizabeth Anne Long on behalf of Viking Technologies, LLC (Long, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Francis Petrsoric on behalf of Viking Technologies, LLC (Petrsoric, John) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Viking Technologies, LLC. Assurant, Inc. served on 11/10/2020, answer due 12/1/2020. (Everingham, Charles) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mark Stewart Raskin on behalf of Viking Technologies, LLC (Raskin, Mark) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued as to Assurant, Inc.. (ch, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Claire Abernathy Henry on behalf of Viking Technologies, LLC (Henry, Claire) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrea Leigh Fair on behalf of Viking Technologies, LLC (Fair, Andrea) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Viking Technologies, LLC (Everingham, Charles) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Viking Technologies, LLC. (Everingham, Charles) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Everingham, Charles) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Assurant, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-8095965.), filed by Viking Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1- US Patent No. 8,888,953, #3 Exhibit 2- US Patent No. 10,220,537)(Everingham, Charles) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
