Solas OLED Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
| Solas OLED Ltd. |
| Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. |
| 2:2021cv00105 |
| March 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by John C Kappos on behalf of Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-8373636. (Kappos, John) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Nicholas J Whilt on behalf of Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-8373542. (Whilt, Nicholas) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ryan K Yagura on behalf of Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Yagura, Ryan) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., filed by Solas OLED Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Mirzaie, Reza) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT AND WAIVER OF FOREIGN SERVICE REQUIREMENT. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. answer due 6/14/2021; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. answer due 6/14/2021. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 4/5/2021. (ch, )
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT AND WAIVER OF FOREIGN SERVICE REQUIREMENT by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued as to Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es))(ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by James Shrin Tsuei on behalf of Solas OLED Ltd. (Tsuei, James) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Neil Alan Rubin on behalf of Solas OLED Ltd. (Rubin, Neil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Marc A Fenster on behalf of Solas OLED Ltd. (Fenster, Marc) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Solas OLED Ltd.. (Mirzaie, Reza) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Mirzaie, Reza) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Solas OLED Ltd. (Mirzaie, Reza) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8311799.), filed by Solas OLED Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons(es), #5 Summons(es))(Mirzaie, Reza) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
