Cloud Systems HoldCo IP, LLC v. Vector Security, Inc.
| Cloud Systems HoldCo IP, LLC |
| Vector Security, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv00264 |
| June 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) at termination of case. AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (nkl, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/28/2023. (nkl, )
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Cloud Systems HoldCo IP, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to Complaint by Cloud Systems HoldCo IP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ramey, William) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cloud Systems HoldCo IP, LLC. Vector Security, Inc. served on 6/6/2023, answer due 6/27/2023. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Vector Security, Inc.. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Cloud Systems HoldCo IP, LLC (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 3 FILED IN ERROR NOTICE by Cloud Systems HoldCo IP, LLC Request for Summons (Ramey, William) Modified on 6/2/2023 (nkl, ). |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Vector Security, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9529999.), filed by Cloud Systems HoldCo IP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (nkl, ) |
| ***FILED IN ERROR - Please send summons to newcasemsh@txed.uscourts.gov for issuance. Document # 3, Notice. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (nkl, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cloud Systems HoldCo IP, LLC v. Vector Security, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cloud Systems HoldCo IP, LLC | |
| Represented By: | William P Ramey, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Vector Security, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
