ParTec AG et al v. Microsoft Corporation
| BF exaQC AG and ParTec AG |
| Microsoft Corporation |
| 2:2024cv00433 |
| June 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER: Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 9/18/2024 at 01:30 PM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 8/8/2024. (CH)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Jeffrey S Seddon, II on behalf of Microsoft Corporation. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-10284386. (Seddon, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Betty Hong Chen on behalf of Microsoft Corporation (Chen, Betty) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Microsoft Corporation.(Smith, Melissa) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Microsoft Corporation to 8/17/2024. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(CH) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ParTec AG, BF exaQC AG. Microsoft Corporation served on 6/12/2024. (Henry, Claire) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Justin Adatto Nelson on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Nelson, Justin) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Elizabeth L DeRieux on behalf of BF exaQC AG, ParTec AG (DeRieux, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by S. Calvin Capshaw, III on behalf of BF exaQC AG, ParTec AG (Capshaw, S.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alexander W. Aiken on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Aiken, Alexander) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew R Berry on behalf of BF exaQC AG, ParTec AG (Berry, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Microsoft Corporation. (NKL) |
| Filing 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by BF exaQC AG, ParTec AG identifying Other Affiliate BF Tec Holding GmbH, Other Affiliate HSC Beteiligungs GmbH, Other Affiliate J.A.C.C. Technotrans GmbH for BF exaQC AG ; Other Affiliate BF Tec Holding GmbH, Other Affiliate HSC Beteiligungs GmbH for ParTec AG. (Henry, Claire) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by BF exaQC AG, ParTec AG. (Henry, Claire) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Henry, Claire) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Microsoft Corporation ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10180493.), filed by ParTec AG, BF exaQC AG. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent 10,142,156, #3 Exhibit B - U.S. Patent 11,934,883, #4 Exhibit C - U.S. Patent 11,537,442)(Henry, Claire) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (NKL) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (NKL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
