Pesarik v. Rosenthal
Plaintiff: Jefferey S Pesarik
Defendant: Glynda A Rosenthal
Case Number: 4:2008cv00097
Filed: March 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Assault Libel & Slander Office
County: Collin
Presiding Judge: Don D. Bush
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Schneider
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 25 Report and Recommendations, therefore Plaintiff's Request for a default judgment and motion for default judgment is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 09/26/2008. (lhj, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pesarik v. Rosenthal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jefferey S Pesarik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glynda A Rosenthal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?