Norton v. Assisted Living Concepts, Inc.
||Michael J Norton
||Assisted Living Concepts, Inc.
||March 2, 2010
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
||Richard A. Schell
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||29:2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 18, 2011
MEMORANDUM REJECTING NORTON'S QUASI ESTOPPEL ARGUMENT. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 5/17/2011. (baf, )
|May 13, 2011
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS - DENYING 37 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment and Brief in Support filed by Assisted Living Concepts, Inc., DENYING 50 MOTION in Limine filed by Assisted Living Concepts, Inc., DENYING [58 ] MOTION to Strike Norton's Objections and Motion to Strike ALC's Proposed Exhibits filed by Michael J Norton, DENYING 12 MOTION to Compel Discovery and Motion to Exclude filed by Assisted Living Concepts, Inc., DENYING 32 MOTION to Compel Norton's Motion to Compel Response to RFP No. 23, and Request For Oral Hearing filed by Michael J Norton, DENYING 34 MOTION for Summary Judgment Norton's Motion For Summary Judgment On ALC's Counterclaim F or Conversion filed by Michael J Norton, DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART 20 MOTION to Compel Norton's Motion to Compel Answers To Interrogatories, And Request For Oral Hearing filed by Michael J Norton, GRANTING 49 MOTION in Limine Norton's Motion in Limine filed by Michael J Norton, GRANTING 36 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Norton's Motion For Partial Judgment On The Pleadings filed by Michael J Norton. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 5/13/2011. (baf, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?