Jones v. Anderson, et al
||Andy Anderson, Nancy Anderson and Bar Lo Kennels Grooming
||June 6, 2014
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
||Richard A. Schell
|Nature of Suit:
||Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1332
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 31, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE GRANTING 31 First MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Nancy Anderson, Andy Anderson, Bar Lo Kennels Grooming, DENYING AS MOOT 54 MOTION to Strike 46 Notice of D iscovery Disclosure Plaintiff, Marci Jones', Amended Response to Defendants' Pretrial Disclosures and Motions in Limine filed by Marci Jones, DENYING AS MOOT 33 Amended MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Experts William Re a, M.D., and John W. Ellis, M.D. filed by Nancy Anderson, Andy Anderson, Bar Lo Kennels Grooming, DENYING AS MOOT 48 Opposed MOTION to Strike 44 Notice (Other) of Plaintiff's Pretrial Disclosures filed by Nancy Anderson , Andy Anderson, Bar Lo Kennels Grooming, DENYING AS MOOT 34 Amended MOTION to Strike Plaintiff Marci Jones' Amended Objection and Motion to Strike Defendants' Expert Witnesses filed by Marci Jones, DENYING AS MOOT 47 Am ended MOTION in Limine filed by Nancy Anderson, Andy Anderson, Bar Lo Kennels Grooming, DENYING 66 Amended MOTION to Amend/Correct 7 Amended Complaint Plaintiff's Amended Memorandum and Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint filed by Marci Jones. Signed by Magistrate Judge Don D. Bush on 8/31/16. (cm, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?