Tassio v. OneMain Financial, Inc. et al
||Stephen Charles Tassio
||OneMain Financial, Inc. and Christi Merritt
||July 16, 2015
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
||Don D. Bush
|Nature of Suit:
||Truth in Lending
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 19, 2016
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DISMISSING CASE for 45 Report and Recommendation. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's objections are overruled and the Report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #45) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the court. It is further ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. #32) and Defendants Supplemental Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. #37) are GRANTED and the above- styled civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All costs are taxed to Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 12/16/2016. (kls, )
|February 3, 2016
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by OneMain Financial, Inc., Christi Merritt. Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. 5) should be GRANTED, Plaintiff's claims should be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim, and this matter should be closed on the Court's docket with all costs to be borne by the party incurring same. Signed by Magistrate Judge Don D. Bush on 2/3/2016. (kls, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?