Johnson v. Target Corporation

Johnson v. Target Corporation

Plaintiff:	Jimmy D Johnson
Defendant:	Target Corporation
Case Number:	4:2015cv00570
Filed:	August 12, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office:	Sherman Office
County:	Grayson
Presiding Judge:	Christine A. Nowak
Presiding Judge:	Amos L. Mazzant
Nature of Suit:	Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 9, 2017	Filing 60 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, re [ 57 Report and Recommendation, 22 MOTION for Sanctions, Motion to Declare Mr. Johnson a Vexatious Litigant filed by Target Corporation, 23 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Target Corporation, 37 MOTION to Dismiss Rule 8 Motion to Dismiss filed by Target Corporation, 39 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Target Corporation, 40 MOTION to Dismiss, Rule 8 Motion to Dismiss filed by Target Corporation. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, having considered each of Plaintiff's timely filed objections (Dkt. #59), and having conducted a de novo rev iew, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report (Dkt. #57) as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Plaintiff's claims against Defe ndant Target Corporation are DISMISSED with prejudice. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #23) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failing to State a Claim (Dkt. #3 7), Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #39), and Rule 8 Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #40) are DENIED AS MOOT. It is further ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Declare Mr. Johnson a Vexatious Litigant (Dkt. #22) is DENIED. All relief not previously granted is hereby denied. The Clerk is directed to close this civil action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 2/8/2017. (kls, )

Date Filed

Document Text

February 9, 2017

Filing 60 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, re [ 57 Report and Recommendation, 22 MOTION for Sanctions, Motion to Declare Mr. Johnson a Vexatious Litigant filed by Target Corporation, 23 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Target Corporation, 37 MOTION to Dismiss Rule 8 Motion to Dismiss filed by Target Corporation, 39 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Target Corporation, 40 MOTION to Dismiss, Rule 8 Motion to Dismiss filed by Target Corporation. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, having considered each of Plaintiff's timely filed objections (Dkt. #59), and having conducted a de novo rev iew, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report (Dkt. #57) as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Plaintiff's claims against Defe ndant Target Corporation are DISMISSED with prejudice. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #23) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failing to State a Claim (Dkt. #3 7), Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #39), and Rule 8 Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #40) are DENIED AS MOOT. It is further ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Declare Mr. Johnson a Vexatious Litigant (Dkt. #22) is DENIED. All relief not previously granted is hereby denied. The Clerk is directed to close this civil action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 2/8/2017. (kls, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Target Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jimmy D Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?