Dorris v. City of McKinney, Texas et al
||City of McKinney, Texas, Daniel Kistner and Jose Madrigal
||January 22, 2016
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
||Amos L. Mazzant
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 12, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants Daniel Kistner's and Jose Madrigal's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 51 ) is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 7/12/2017. (baf, )
|April 10, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Kistner's and Defendant Madrigal's motions to dismiss Plaintiff's claims against them in their individual capacities based on the defense of qualified immunity ( Dkts. #21, #22) are hereby denied. The remainder of Defendant Kistner's and Defendant Madrigal's motions to dismiss were addressed in the Court's October 4, 2016 order (Dkt. #44). Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 4/10/2017. (baf, )
|October 4, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that the Citys Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 20 ) is hereby DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. It is further ORDERED that the Individual Defendants Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, or in the alternative, Motions for Rule 7(a) Reply (Dkts. 21 , 22 ) are DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/4/2016. (baf, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?