Cunningham v. Careington International Corporation

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Eastern District Cunningham v. Careington International Corporation

Cunningham v. Careington International Corporation

Plaintiff:	Craig Cunningham
Defendant:	Careington International Corporation
Case Number:	4:2017cv00040
Filed:	January 16, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office:	Sherman Office
County:	Anderson
Presiding Judge:	Christine A. Nowak
Presiding Judge:	Amos L. Mazzant
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 17, 2017	Filing 38 AMENDED MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 36 Report and Recommendations re 36 Report and Recommendations, Order, 35 MOTION to Dismiss ALL DEFENDANTS. The entirety of Plaintiff Craig Cunninghams claims against all Defendants are hereby dismissed without prejudice. Costs are taxed against the party incurring same. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/17/2017.(cm, )
October 10, 2017	Filing 37 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 36 Report and Recommendations, Order, 35 MOTION to Dismiss ALL DEFENDANTS filed by Craig Cunningham. The entirety of Plaintiff Craig Cunningham's claims against all Defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Costs are taxed against the party incurring same. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/10/2017. (rpc, )

Date Filed

Document Text

October 17, 2017

Filing 38 AMENDED MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 36 Report and Recommendations re 36 Report and Recommendations, Order, 35 MOTION to Dismiss ALL DEFENDANTS. The entirety of Plaintiff Craig Cunninghams claims against all Defendants are hereby dismissed without prejudice. Costs are taxed against the party incurring same. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/17/2017.(cm, )

October 10, 2017

Filing 37 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 36 Report and Recommendations, Order, 35 MOTION to Dismiss ALL DEFENDANTS filed by Craig Cunningham. The entirety of Plaintiff Craig Cunningham's claims against all Defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Costs are taxed against the party incurring same. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/10/2017. (rpc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cunningham v. Careington International Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Craig Cunningham
Represented By:	Aaron Kyle Mulvey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Careington International Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?