Dynamic Applet Technologies, LLC v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Eastern District Dynamic Applet Technologies, LLC v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.

Dynamic Applet Technologies, LLC v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Dynamic Applet Technologies, LLC
Defendant:	Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Case Number:	4:2017cv00862
Filed:	December 15, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office:	Sherman Office
County:	Grayson
Presiding Judge:	Kimberly C Priest Johnson
Presiding Judge:	Amos L. Mazzant
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	35 U.S.C. § 145
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 13, 2019	Filing 34 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #130) is GRANTED, and this entire action, and all of the claims asserted therein, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own costs. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 5/13/2019. (baf, )
September 18, 2018	Filing 32 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING 31 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Mattress Firm Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss (Case No. 4:17cv860, Dkt. #15) is DENIED; Defendant PetSmart's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Case No. 4:17-cv-861, Dkt. #9) is DENIED; Defendant Urban Outfitters' Motion to Dismiss (Case No. 4:17-cv-862, Dkt. # 13 ) is DENIED; and Defendant Hollister's Motion to Dismiss (Case No. 4:17-cv-878, Dkt. #11) is DENIED.. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/18/2018. (rpc, )

Date Filed

Document Text

May 13, 2019

Filing 34 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #130) is GRANTED, and this entire action, and all of the claims asserted therein, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own costs. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 5/13/2019. (baf, )

September 18, 2018

Filing 32 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING 31 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Mattress Firm Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss (Case No. 4:17cv860, Dkt. #15) is DENIED; Defendant PetSmart's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Case No. 4:17-cv-861, Dkt. #9) is DENIED; Defendant Urban Outfitters' Motion to Dismiss (Case No. 4:17-cv-862, Dkt. # 13 ) is DENIED; and Defendant Hollister's Motion to Dismiss (Case No. 4:17-cv-878, Dkt. #11) is DENIED.. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/18/2018. (rpc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dynamic Applet Technologies, LLC v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dynamic Applet Technologies, LLC
Represented By:	Timothy Devlin
Represented By:	Robert Dean Kiddie, Jr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Represented By:	Scott J Bornstein
Represented By:	Vimal M. Kapadia
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?