Lee v. Commissioner, SSA
Christina Lee |
Commissioner, SSA |
4:2018cv00605 |
August 23, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Amos L Mazzant |
Christine A Nowak |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 427 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Commissioner, SSA (Ocf of General Counsel, SSA) served on 9/7/2018, answer due 11/6/2018. (baf, ) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Commissioner, SSA (U.S. Attorney General) served on 9/10/2018, answer due 11/09/2018. (baf, ) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Commissioner, SSA served on 9/6/2018, answer due 11/5/2018. (daj, ) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Commissioner, SSA, filed by Christina Lee.(Scoggin, Steven) Modified on 9/12/2018 (daj, ). |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Commissioner, SSA and forwarded to USM for service (Attachments: #1 Summons(es), #2 Summons(es))(baf, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. ORDERED that Plaintiff shall prepare service of process on the Defendant in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas within thirty (30) days of receiving this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall issue process and the United States Marshal shall serve process upon the Defendant within thirty (30) days of receiving completed process from the Clerk of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 8/23/2018. (daj, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Christina Lee Certificate of Interested Persons (Scoggin, Steven) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Christina Lee. (Scoggin, Steven) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Christina Lee, filed by Christina Lee. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons(es))(Scoggin, Steven) |
Case assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak. (daj, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lee v. Commissioner, SSA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Christina Lee | |
Represented By: | Steven Ross Scoggin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner, SSA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.