Ideative Product Ventures, Inc. v. THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Plaintiff: Ideative Product Ventures, Inc.
Defendant: THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Case Number: 4:2018cv00844
Filed: December 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Amos L Mazzant
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2019 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. to 2/11/2019. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( rpc, )
January 15, 2019 Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC..( Papastavros, Nicholas)
December 14, 2018 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. to 1/25/2019. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( rpc, )
December 13, 2018 Filing 5 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC..( Papastavros, Nicholas)
December 4, 2018 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. (rpc, )
December 4, 2018 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (rpc, )
December 3, 2018 Case Assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (rpc, )
December 3, 2018 Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Sorden, Gary)
December 3, 2018 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Ideative Product Ventures, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Ideative, Inc. for Ideative Product Ventures, Inc.. (Sorden, Gary)
December 3, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7047364.), filed by Ideative Product Ventures, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(Sorden, Gary)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ideative Product Ventures, Inc. v. THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ideative Product Ventures, Inc.
Represented By: Gary R Sorden
Represented By: Timothy J.H. Craddock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Represented By: Nicholas G Papastavros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?