Shaunfield v. Citibank, N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Barbara Shaunfield
Defendant: Citibank, N.A. and Synchrony Bank
Case Number: 4:2021cv00918
Filed: November 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Amos L Mazzant
Referring Judge: Christine A Nowak
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2022 Filing 21 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by Synchrony Bank. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Blount, Cheryl) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/14/2022) (daj, ).
January 10, 2022 Filing 20 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Powers, Meagan) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/13/2022: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (daj, ).
January 3, 2022 Filing 19 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Citibank, N.A., Synchrony Bank, filed by Barbara Shaunfield.(baf, )
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER - granting #17 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Kevin Thomas Crocker terminated. Cheryl L. Blount of Reed Smith LLP is hereby designated as lead counsel for Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 12/22/2021. (baf, )
December 21, 2021 Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Synchrony Bank. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Blount, Cheryl)
December 20, 2021 Filing 16 ***DEFICIENT DOCUMENT - PLEASE DISREGARD***Consent MOTION to Substitute Attorney Cheryl L. Blount as counsel of record in place of Kevin Thomas Crocker by Synchrony Bank. (Blount, Cheryl) Modified on 12/20/2021 (baf, ).
December 20, 2021 NOTICE of Deficiency regarding the CONSENT ORDER - SUBMITTED DOCUMENT #16 - MOTION WITH PROPOSED FILED AS AN ATTACHMENT IS REQUIRED. Correction should be made by ONE BUSINESS DAY (baf, )
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. The case is SET for a Rule 16 management conference on 1/25/2022 at 1:00 PM in Ctrm A01 (Sherman - Annex) before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III. Rule 26 Meeting Joint Report due by 1/10/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 12/6/2021. (baf, )
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER AND ADVISORY re #1 Notice of Removal filed by Citibank, N.A.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 12/6/2021. (baf, )
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER - denying #10 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 12/6/2021. (baf, )
December 2, 2021 Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Citibank, N.A., Synchrony Bank. (Crocker, Kevin)
November 29, 2021 Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Citibank, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent CitiGroup, Inc. for Citibank, N.A.. (Powers, Meagan)
November 22, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION to Consolidate by Barbara Shaunfield. (baf, )
November 22, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Vacation by Barbara Shaunfield. (baf, )
November 21, 2021 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Synchrony Bank identifying Corporate Parent Synchrony Financial for Synchrony Bank. (Crocker, Kevin)
November 21, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kevin Thomas Crocker on behalf of Synchrony Bank (Crocker, Kevin)
November 20, 2021 Filing 2 Additional Attachments to Main Document - Civil Cover Sheet: #1 Notice of Removal.. (Powers, Meagan)
November 19, 2021 Filing 8 Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Referral) (baf, )
November 19, 2021 Filing 7 ***ANSWER FILED IN STATE COURT*** ANSWER to #5 Complaint by Synchrony Bank.(baf, )
November 19, 2021 Filing 6 ***ANSWER FILED IN STATE COURT*** ANSWER to #5 Complaint by Citibank, N.A..(baf, )
November 19, 2021 Filing 5 ***COMPLAINT FILED IN STATE COURT***COMPLAINT against Citibank, N.A., Synchrony Bank, filed by Barbara Shaunfield.(baf, )
November 19, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Citibank, N.A. from 380th District Court of Collin County Texas, case number 380-05792-2021. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8681326), filed by Citibank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(Powers, Meagan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shaunfield v. Citibank, N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara Shaunfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Citibank, N.A.
Represented By: Katherine M. Anand
Represented By: Meagan Martin Powers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Synchrony Bank
Represented By: Kevin Thomas Crocker
Represented By: Cheryl Lee Blount
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?