Cox v. Merchants Association Collection Division, Inc.
Jill Cox |
Merchants Association Collection Division, Inc. doing business as Sherloq Financial |
4:2022cv00017 |
January 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Amos L Mazzant |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER. It is so ORDERED by the Court that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, as stipulated. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 4/21/2022. (baf, ) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Jill Cox. (Lewis, Tod) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/19/2022: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (baf, ). |
Filing 5 ORDER ON CLOSING DOCUMENTS. The Court has been notified by the parties, through Counsel, that all claims in the above-styled civil action have been settled. Therefore, it is ORDERED that, on or before May 2, 2022, all parties shall file with the Court all papers necessary for the closing of this case and its removal from the active docket of this Court. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 3/17/2022. (baf, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Settlement by Jill Cox (Lewis, Tod) |
Filing 3 ORDER NOTICE OF IMPENDING DISMISSAL. To avoid dismissal pursuant to Rule 4 (m), if more than 90 days are necessary for service of process, Plaintiff must execute and file a verified petition regarding service of process on or before 3/28/2022. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 3/16/2022. (baf, ) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Merchants Association Collection Division, Inc. (rpc, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8740966.), filed by Jill Cox. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Sherloq Collection Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lewis, Tod) |
Case Assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (rpc, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (rpc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cox v. Merchants Association Collection Division, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jill Cox | |
Represented By: | Tod Allen Lewis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Merchants Association Collection Division, Inc. doing business as Sherloq Financial | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.