O&M HALYARD, INC. v. SRI TRANG USA, INC et al
Plaintiff: O&M HALYARD, INC.
Defendant: SRI TRANG USA, INC, SRI TRANG GLOVES (THAILAND) PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED, SRI TRANG ARGO-INDUSTRY PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED and Does 1 through 10
Case Number: 4:2022cv00622
Filed: July 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sean D Jordan
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Dermot Horgan on behalf of SRI TRANG ARGO-INDUSTRY PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED, SRI TRANG GLOVES (THAILAND) PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED, SRI TRANG USA, INC. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9132645. (Horgan, Dermot)
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Christopher Lay on behalf of SRI TRANG ARGO-INDUSTRY PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED, SRI TRANG GLOVES (THAILAND) PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED, SRI TRANG USA, INC. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9132592. (Lay, Christopher)
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 8/31/2022. (rpc, )
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Answer Due Deadline Updated to 11/23/2022 for SRI TRANG USA, INC. (rpc, )
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by O&M HALYARD, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Howen, Stephen)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ***DEFICIENT. TO BE REFILED. PLEASE DISREGARD*** STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT BY NO MORE THAN 30 DAYS by O&M HALYARD, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Howen, Stephen) Modified on 8/29/2022 (rpc, ).
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by O&M HALYARD, INC.. SRI TRANG ARGO-INDUSTRY PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED waiver sent on 8/25/2022, answer due 11/23/2022; SRI TRANG GLOVES (THAILAND) PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED waiver sent on 8/25/2022, answer due 11/23/2022; SRI TRANG USA, INC waiver sent on 8/25/2022, answer due 11/23/2022. (Howen, Stephen)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTICE of Deficiency regarding the #4 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT BY NO MORE THAN 30 DAYS submitted by O&M HALYARD, INC. A Motion should be filed instead of a Stipulation. Correction should be made by one business day. (rpc, )
July 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to SRI TRANG USA, INC. (rpc, )
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (rpc, )
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (rpc, )
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9031750.), filed by O&M HALYARD, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 AO 120, #8 Corporate Disclosure, #9 Summons(es))(Howen, Stephen) (Attachment 6 replaced with flattened image on 7/22/2022) (rpc, ). Modified on 7/22/2022 (rpc, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O&M HALYARD, INC. v. SRI TRANG USA, INC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: O&M HALYARD, INC.
Represented By: Stephen Dale Howen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SRI TRANG USA, INC
Represented By: Christopher Lay
Represented By: Dermot Horgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SRI TRANG GLOVES (THAILAND) PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
Represented By: Christopher Lay
Represented By: Dermot Horgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SRI TRANG ARGO-INDUSTRY PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
Represented By: Christopher Lay
Represented By: Dermot Horgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?