Krohn v. USP Warden et al
| Nikko Krohn |
| USP Warden, USP Capt. Obrian, SIS Mcbride and SIS Ganz |
| 4:2022cv01026 |
| December 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sean D Jordan |
| Christine A Nowak |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. ORDER #6 sent to NIKKO KROHN returned marked "RETURN TO SENDER - ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN - UNABLE TO FORWARD - RETURN TO SENDER" (baf, ) |
Filing 11
ORDER withdrawing #9 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff is directed to comply with the Deficiency Order [Dkt. 4] within thirty (30) days of receipt of same. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 1/23/2023. (mmc)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address by Nikko Krohn: FCI Beckley, P.O. Box 350, Beaver, WV 25813 (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(mmc) |
|
Filing 9
***WITHDRAWN PER #11 ORDER*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of United States Magistrate Judge re #1 Complaint filed by Nikko Krohn. It is therefore recommended that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ.P. 41(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 1/17/2023. (mmc) Modified on 1/24/2023 (mmc).
|
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable to Nikko Krohn: Order #4 and form 1983 returned "NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED" with following address affixed to envelope: 1600 Industrial Park Rd, Beaver WV 25813. (mmc) |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT Card to Nikko Krohn returned unsigned. (mmc) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER. It is ORDERED that no later than Tuesday, January 24, 2023, at 5:00 p.m., Plaintiff Nikko Krohn shall provide the Clerk of Court with the requested mailing address. Failure to comply with this Order may result in a recommendation for the dismissal of this lawsuit under Rule 41. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 1/3/2023. (mcg)
|
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Order #3 and Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge sent to Nikko Krohn - returned as 'REFUSED - UNABLE TO FORWARD' (mmc) |
|
Filing 4
DEFICIENCY ORDER: Plaintiff has thirty days from the date of this Order to complete the civil rights form. Plaintiff has thirty days from the date of this Order to either pay the $402.00 filing fee or submit a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, together with an in forma pauperis data sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 12/12/2022. (mmc)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Nikko Krohn. (mmc) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan and referred to Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Referral) (mmc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Nikko Krohn.(mmc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/5/2022: #1 Envelope(s)) (mmc, ). |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. **Consent form mailed to Plaintiff. (mmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
