Crystal Mountain Communications, LLC v. TP-Link Corporation Limited et al
Crystal Mountain Communications, LLC |
TP-Link Corporation Limited and TP-Technologies Co., LTD |
4:2024cv00098 |
February 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Amos L Mazzant |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kristopher L Reed on behalf of TP-Link Corporation Limited, TP-Technologies Co., LTD (Reed, Kristopher) |
Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Crystal Mountain Communications, LLC. TP-Technologies Co., LTD waiver sent on 2/29/2024, answer due 5/29/2024. (Price, Hannah) |
Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Crystal Mountain Communications, LLC. TP-Link Corporation Limited waiver sent on 2/29/2024, answer due 5/29/2024. (Price, Hannah) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Hannah D. Price on behalf of Crystal Mountain Communications, LLC (Price, Hannah) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Rehan Mohammed Safiullah on behalf of Crystal Mountain Communications, LLC (Safiullah, Rehan) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew J Antonelli on behalf of Crystal Mountain Communications, LLC (Antonelli, Matthew) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Larry Dean Thompson, Jr on behalf of Crystal Mountain Communications, LLC (Thompson, Larry) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Crystal Mountain Communications, LLC. TP-Technologies Co., LTD served on 2/7/2024. (Harrington, Zachariah) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Crystal Mountain Communications, LLC. TP-Link Corporation Limited served on 2/7/2024. (Harrington, Zachariah) |
Filing 6 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Crystal Mountain Communications, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Mind Fusion, LLC, Corporate Parent Ascend Innovation Management, LLC for Crystal Mountain Communications, LLC. (Harrington, Zachariah) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Cases by Crystal Mountain Communications, LLC (Harrington, Zachariah) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to TP-Technologies Co., LTD. (baf, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to TP-Link Corporation Limited. (baf, ) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Harrington, Zachariah) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against TP-Link Corporation Limited, TP-Link Technologies Co., Ltd. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-9959878.), filed by Crystal Mountain Communications, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - US7103313B2 vs TP Link Archer C2300, #3 Exhibit B - US7266121B2 vs. TP-Link Archer C5, #4 Exhibit C - US7746824B2 Vs TP-Link X80-5G, #5 Exhibit D - US7746824B2 Vs TP-Link MX515v 4G+ Router)(Harrington, Zachariah) |
Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (baf, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.