Williams v. Thompson et al
| Arthur Lee Williams |
| Frederick L Gooden, Jeffery K Calfee and Paul I Thompson |
| 5:2011cv00068 |
| March 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Texarkana Office |
| Bowie |
| Caroline Craven |
| David Folsom |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 50 Report and Recommendations, denying 34 MOTION for Reconsideration re 33 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 9/19/12. (mrm, )
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 39 Report and Recommendations: denying 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Arthur Lee Williams, granted and denied in part 31 Supplemental MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Jeffery K Calfee, Paul I Thompson, Frederick L Gooden, granted and denied in part 26 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Jeffery K Calfee, Paul I Thompson, Frederick L Gooden. Jeffery K Calfee and Frederick L Gooden terminated. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 2/27/12. (mrm, )
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 24 Report and Recommendations, denying 8 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Arthur Lee Williams. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 9/19/11. (mrm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
