Nelson v. Griffin et al
| Brian N Nelson |
| Rory L Griffin, J Shah, Bob Page and Regina Lynch |
| 5:2016cv00049 |
| April 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Texarkana Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Caroline Craven |
| Robert W. Schroeder |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 109 Report and Recommendation. It is ORDERED that Defendants Motions for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 91, 92) are GRANTED and the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All other motions pending in this matter are DENIED. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 3/12/2018. (slo, )
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER ADOPTING 75 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDERED that 35 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 8/30/2017. (sm, )
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 10 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiffs claims against the Defendants Rory Griffin and Warden Page are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Griffin and Warden Page are DISMISSED as parties to this lawsuit. The dismissal of these claims and parties shall have no effect upon the remainder of the Plaintiffs claims in this case. Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 5/25/2017. (slo, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
