Medlock v. Hutchinson et al
| Victor Medlock, Jr |
| Asa Hutchinson, Wendy Kelley, Robert Page, Eric Nelson, Rodney Cooper, Garrett, Mundoza, Sumner, Pearson, Benett, Charpentice, Walker, G Scott and John Does |
| 5:2017cv00108 |
| May 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Texarkana Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Caroline Craven |
| Robert W. Schroeder |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER. It is ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 34) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 31) is GRANTED and the above civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 03/13/19. (lfs, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER ADOPTING 20 AND RECOMMENDATIONS and FURTHER ORDERED that 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment and injunctive relief is DENIED filed by Victor Medlock, Jr.. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 3/12/2018. (sm, )
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDERED that plaintiffs claims against Governor Hutchinson and Director Kelley are Dismissed Without Prejudice. Asa Hutchinson (Governor, State of Arkansas) and Wendy Kelley (Director, Arkansas Department of Correction) are now terminated.. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 1/31/2018. (sm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
