REIGNTEK IP LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
| REIGNTEK IP LLC |
| Microsoft Corporation |
| 5:2018cv00112 |
| September 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Microsoft Corporation.( Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Microsoft Corporation.( Smith, Melissa) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is GRANTED pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Microsoft Corporation to 12/20/2018. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( slo, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is GRANTED pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Microsoft Corporation to 1/4/2019. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( slo, ) Modified on 11/5/2018 (slo, ). |
| Answer Due Deadline Updated for Microsoft Corporation to 1/4/2019. (slo, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by REIGNTEK IP LLC. Microsoft Corporation served on 10/30/2018, answer due 11/20/2018. (Corcoran, Peter) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Microsoft Corporation. (slo, ) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Corcoran, Peter) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by REIGNTEK IP LLC (Corcoran, Peter) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (sm, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (sm, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Microsoft Corporation ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-6941998.), filed by REIGNTEK IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2003.10.14 US6633901 (Zuili), #2 Exhibit 6633901 Claim Chart (Microsoft), #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Corcoran, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: REIGNTEK IP LLC v. Microsoft Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: REIGNTEK IP LLC | |
| Represented By: | Peter Joseph Corcoran, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Microsoft Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Melissa Richards Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
