Cunningham v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Rashaan Cunningham
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 5:2024cv00113
Filed: August 9, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: James Boone Baxter
Referring Judge: Robert W Schroeder
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2024 Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Texas Southern; Case Number 4:24-cv-02949. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
August 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified. (jm4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 8/9/2024.]
August 9, 2024 Opinion or Order STANDING ORDER REFERRING HABEAS CASES to Magistrate Judge James Boone Baxter for all pretrial matters. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 8/9/2024. (slo)
August 9, 2024 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (slo)
August 9, 2024 Sent Consent to Magistrate, Docket sheet and Prose guidelines, that include information regarding reporting change of address to court, to the Petitioner per Magistrate Judge (slo)
August 9, 2024 Interdistrict transfer to the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on August 9, 2024., filed. (jm4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 8/9/2024.]
August 5, 2024 Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (rrb4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 8/9/2024.]
August 5, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Rashaan Cunningham. (rrb4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 8/9/2024.]
August 5, 2024 Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y. Ho randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (rrb4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 8/9/2024.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cunningham v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rashaan Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Represented By: Edward Larry Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?