Dixon v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Harold E Dixon, Jr
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 6:2008cv00170
Filed: April 30, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Leonard Davis
Presiding Judge: John D. Love
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 12 Report and Recommendations. Action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Petitioner is DENIED COA. ALL MOTIONS NOT PREVIOUSLY RULED ON ARE DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 11/10/2008. (gsg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dixon v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Harold E Dixon, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?