Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
| Eidos Display, LLC and Eidos III, LLC |
| AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Innolux Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd., HannStar Display Corporation and Hannspree North America, Inc. |
| 6:2011cv00201 |
| April 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Anderson |
| Leonard Davis |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
901
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Plaintiffs' Motion for Enhanced Damages 876 is GRANTED-AS-MODIFIED, such that the appropriate enhancement in this case is $4.1 million, in addition to the $4.1 million awarded by the jury. Plaintiffs 9; Motion for Attorney's Fees 883 is DENIED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Pre-Judgment and Post-Judgment Interest 884 is GRANTED. Accordingly, the appropriate rate for pre-judgment interest is the prime rate, compounded quarterly, and the app ropriate rate for post-judgment interest is the 1-year constant maturity Treasury yield rate. Plaintiffs' Motion for Clarification and Entry of Judgment 882 is GRANTED-AS-MODIFIED. Plaintiffs' claim for indirect infringement is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 03/05/18. (mll, )
|
|
Filing
895
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (re Equitable Estoppel). The Court finds that the doctrine of equitable estoppel does not bar Plaintiffs' recovery of damages on any claim for infringement in this case and Innolux's defense of equitable estoppel is therefore DENIED and DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 12/8/2017. (rlf)
|
|
Filing
722
UNSEALED VERSION OF 713 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 682 Motion to Exclude the Opinion and Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Arthur Cobb. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 3/29/2017. (rlf)
|
|
Filing
715
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Granting-in-Part and Denying-in-Part 679 SEALED MOTION to Preclude Jerzy Kanicki and Roger Stewart from Testifying on Rejected Limitations Regarding "Metal Film" and "Gate Wiring. Within 14 days of the issuance of this Order, Dr. Kanicki and Mr. Stewart shall amend their reports consistent with the findings herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 4/1/2017. (rlf)
|
|
Filing
703
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Opinions of Dr. Smith (Doc. No. 681) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 3/22/2017. (rlf)
|
|
Filing
611
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION and ORDER DENYING 601 MOTION for Joinder to Join Stairway Capital filed by Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Chi Mei Innolux Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 11/10/2016. (gsg)
|
|
Filing
580
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, and ORDER granting in part and denying in part re 520 Opposed MOTION Seeking Construction of "Gate Wiring", and 521 SEALED MOTION re Gate Wiring. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 2/18/2016. (gsg)
|
|
Filing
505
MEMORANDUM, OPINION AND ORDER issued in accordance with the mandate issued by the Federal Circuit. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 9/23/15. (mjc, )
|
|
Filing
419
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: granting 314 Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness; granting 418 Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief. Plaintiff's objections are overruled. The Court adopts the Order of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 01/22/14. (mll, )
|
|
Filing
184
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 04/12/13. (mll, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
