Ericsson Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., et al Featured Case

Defendant: Samsung Telecommunications America LLP, Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ericsson Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
Case Number: 6:2012cv00895
Filed: November 27, 2012
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Office: Tyler Office
County: Collin
Presiding Judge: Leonard Davis
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

We have record of the following docket entries for this case:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 27, 2012 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Stevenson, Theodore)
November 27, 2012 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Ericsson Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson identifying Corporate Parent None for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson; Corporate Parent Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Corporate Parent Ericsson Holding II Inc. for Ericsson Inc.. (Stevenson, Theodore)
November 27, 2012 1 COMPLAINT against Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., LTD.,, Samsung Telecommunications America LLP ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0540-3886889.), filed by Ericsson Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Stevenson, Theodore)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ericsson Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Telecommunications America LLP
Represented By: Ruffin B Cordell
Represented By: John S Goetz
Represented By: Michael E Jones
Represented By: Michael J McKeon
Represented By: Thomas M Melsheimer
Represented By: Indranil Mukerji
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., LTD.,
Represented By: Ruffin B Cordell
Represented By: John S Goetz
Represented By: Michael E Jones
Represented By: Michael J McKeon
Represented By: Thomas M Melsheimer
Represented By: Indranil Mukerji
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Represented By: Ruffin B Cordell
Represented By: John S Goetz
Represented By: Michael E Jones
Represented By: Michael J McKeon
Represented By: Thomas M Melsheimer
Represented By: Indranil Mukerji
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ericsson Inc.
Represented By: Theodore Stevenson, III
Represented By: Douglas A Cawley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
Represented By: Douglas A Cawley
Represented By: Theodore Stevenson, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.