Lindsey v. Sah
Plaintiff: Kemuel Lindsey
Defendant: S Sah
Case Number: 6:2015cv00695
Filed: July 15, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Tyler Office
County: Potter
Presiding Judge: K. Nicole Mitchell
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Schneider
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Report and Recommendation 25 is ADOPTED. The complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling the claim until such time as he can demonstrate that he has been able to have his disciplinary case reversed, expunged or otherwise declared invalid. All motions not previously ruled on are DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 12/02/15. (mll, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lindsey v. Sah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kemuel Lindsey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S Sah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?