Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. Pantech Co. Ltd
Plaintiff: Cellular Communications Equipment LLC
Defendant: Pantech Co. Ltd
Case Number: 6:2015cv00853
Filed: September 14, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Tyler Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Presiding Judge: K. Nicole Mitchell
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. Pantech Co. Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cellular Communications Equipment LLC
Represented By: Thomas Christopher Cecil
Represented By: Ryan P Griffin
Represented By: Claire Abernathy Henry
Represented By: Jack Wesley Hill
Represented By: Steven Brannon Latimer
Represented By: Edward R Nelson, III
Represented By: Thomas John Ward, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pantech Co. Ltd
Represented By: Oluwaseun Olugbolade Ajayi
Represented By: Hae-Chan Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?