Davis v. Taylor et al
||Jimmy Andrew Davis, Jr
||Greg Taylor, FNU Sharp and FNU Choates
||September 15, 2015
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
||John D. Love
||Michael H. Schneider
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 17, 2017
MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting 56 Report and Recommendation. Ordered that the Defendant Officer Lumpkin's 54 motion for summary judgment is granted and the claims against Lumpkin, which are the last remaining claims active in the case, are dismissed with prejudice for purposes of proceed IFP. Ordered that any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby denied. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 5/17/2017. (bjc, )
|December 19, 2016
ORDERED that the 43 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the District Court insofar as this Report recommends dismissal of the Defendants Sgt Jones, Lt Choates, Captain Sharp, Sgt Conner, Officer Martinez, Officer Laza, Sgt Carmi chael and Sheriff Taylor. Ordered that the motion to dismiss filed by the Defendants (docket no. 28) is granted as to the Defendants Sgt. Jones, Lt. Choates, Captain Sharp, Sgt. Conner, Officer Martinez, Officer Laza, Sgt. Carmichael, and Sheriff Ta ylor. This motion is denied as to the Defendant Officer Lumpkin. Ordered that the Defendant Officer Lumpkin shall have 60 days from the date of entry of this order in which to file any motion for summary judgment which he may have limited to the defense of exhaustion of administrative remedies.. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 12/19/2016. (bjc, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?