Fannin v. Commissioner, SSA
Plaintiff: James Floyd Fannin
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Case Number: 6:2015cv01176
Filed: December 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Tyler Office
County: Smith
Presiding Judge: John D. Love
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Schneider
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2005
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 04/04/16. (mll, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fannin v. Commissioner, SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Floyd Fannin
Represented By: Joel Carter Elliott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?