Linehan v. University of Texas at Tyler

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Eastern District Linehan v. University of Texas at Tyler

Linehan v. University of Texas at Tyler

Plaintiff:	Mary Linehan
Defendant:	University of Texas at Tyler
Case Number:	6:2016cv00066
Filed:	February 19, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office:	Tyler Office
County:	Smith
Presiding Judge:	Michael H. Schneider
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 5, 2018	Filing 96 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 77 Report and Recommendations, and granting 54 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by University of Texas at Tyler. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Introduce New Evidence 89 is GRANTED. Pl aintiff's motions for leave to file a reply 87 and 93 are DENIED. All objections to the R&R are OVERRULED, UTT'S Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 2/5/18. (mjc, )
March 7, 2017	Filing 43 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 36 Report and Recommendations, and granting-in-part and denying-in-part 8 Partial Motion to Dismiss filed by University of Texas at Tyler, denying 29 Motion to Dismiss filed by University of Texas at Tyler and granting 31 Motion for Leave to Amend. All objections are overruled. Any amended complaint shall be filed within 14 days of this Order. Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 3/7/17. (mjc, )

Date Filed

Document Text

February 5, 2018

Filing 96 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 77 Report and Recommendations, and granting 54 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by University of Texas at Tyler. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Introduce New Evidence 89 is GRANTED. Pl aintiff's motions for leave to file a reply 87 and 93 are DENIED. All objections to the R&R are OVERRULED, UTT'S Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 2/5/18. (mjc, )

March 7, 2017

Filing 43 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 36 Report and Recommendations, and granting-in-part and denying-in-part 8 Partial Motion to Dismiss filed by University of Texas at Tyler, denying 29 Motion to Dismiss filed by University of Texas at Tyler and granting 31 Motion for Leave to Amend. All objections are overruled. Any amended complaint shall be filed within 14 days of this Order. Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 3/7/17. (mjc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Linehan v. University of Texas at Tyler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Linehan
Represented By:	Nicholas Alban O'Kelly
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: University of Texas at Tyler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?