Carr v. Collier et al
| Raymond E Carr |
| UTMB Medical Staff, TDCJ Officials, Bryan Collier and Dr. Lannette Linthicum |
| 6:2018cv00351 |
| July 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Cherokee |
| Thad Heartfield |
| John D Love |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bryan Collier, Lannette Linthicum, filed by Raymond E Carr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rlf) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Raymond E Carr. (rlf) |
Filing 9
ORDER TO REPLEAD. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of this order to file an amended complainton the requisite standard 1983 formstating specific facts and details to support his claim(s). Further, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall explain, within thirty (30) days from receipt of this order, why his complaint is not barred by the statute of limitations. Finally, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff a copy of the 1983 form for him to fill out in conformity with this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 7/31/2018. (rlf)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 7/31/2018. (rlf)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to District Judge Thad Heartfield for all further proceedings. District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III no longer assigned to case. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 7/31/2018. (gsg)
|
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Raymond E Carr as to #3 Order - RECEIVED 7.26.2018. (rlf) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Raymond E Carr. (saenz, ) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED PRISONER'S CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Bryan Collier, Lannette Linthicum, filed by Raymond E Carr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(saenz, ) |
|
Filing 3
DEFICIENCY ORDER re #1 Complaint filed by Raymond E Carr. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff has thirty days from the receipt of this order to obtain a 1983 form from the law library, fill it out, and submit it to the Court. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff has thirty days from the receipt of this order to either pay the iling fee of $400 or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, along with an in forma pauperis data sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 7/19/2018. (rlf)
|
| Filing 2 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D. Love. (rlf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TDCJ Officials, UTMB Medical Staff, filed by Raymond E Carr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Memorandum Opinion and Order Case No. H-18-045 TXSD, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(rlf) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. Consent form mailed to Plaintiff. (rlf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
