Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Panda Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
| Fall Line Patents, LLC |
| Panda Express, Inc. and Panda Restaurant Group, Inc. |
| 6:2018cv00413 |
| August 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Panda Express, Inc., Panda Restaurant Group, Inc. (McNabnay, Neil) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint (ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS), COUNTERCLAIM against Fall Line Patents, LLC by Panda Express, Inc., Panda Restaurant Group, Inc..(McNabnay, Neil) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss (DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(6) FOR LACK OF PATENT ELIGIBLE SUBJECT MATTER) by Panda Express, Inc., Panda Restaurant Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Text of Proposed Order)(McNabnay, Neil) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Panda Express, Inc. to 10/12/2018. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(rlf) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Panda Restaurant Group, Inc. to 10/12/2018. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(rlf) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Panda Restaurant Group, Inc..( McNabnay, Neil) |
| Filing 11 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Panda Express, Inc..( McNabnay, Neil) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fall Line Patents, LLC. Panda Restaurant Group, Inc. served on 8/30/2018, answer due 9/20/2018. (Ellis, Michael) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fall Line Patents, LLC. Panda Express, Inc. served on 8/22/2018, answer due 9/12/2018. (Ellis, Michael) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Larry Dean Thompson, Jr on behalf of Fall Line Patents, LLC (Thompson, Larry) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Zachariah Harrington on behalf of Fall Line Patents, LLC (Harrington, Zachariah) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael David Ellis on behalf of Fall Line Patents, LLC (Ellis, Michael) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Fall Line Patents, LLC of Related Cases (Antonelli, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Fall Line Patents, LLC (Antonelli, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Panda Express, Inc., Panda Restaurant Group, Inc., and emailed to Plaintiff for service. (Attachments: #1 SUMMONS - Panda Express, Inc.)(rlf) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Antonelli, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Panda Express, Inc., Panda Restaurant Group, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-6900146.), filed by Fall Line Patents, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Antonelli, Matthew) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Fall Line Patents, LLC. (rlf) |
| District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III added. (rlf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
