Snik LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: Snik LLC
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2019cv00458
Filed: October 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: J Campbell Barker
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2019 Civil action dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(a) and #7 notice of dismissal. (jcb3)
November 25, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Snik LLC (Kyle, John)
October 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Ordered that defendants shall file their responsive pleadings on or before January 29, 2020. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 10/31/2019. (gsg)
October 29, 2019 Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Snik LLC. (Kyle, John)
October 17, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Snik LLC. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. served on 10/10/2019, answer due 10/31/2019. (Kyle, John)
October 10, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es) - Samsung)(gsg)
October 9, 2019 Case assigned to District Judge J. Campbell Barker. (ksd )
October 9, 2019 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ksd)
October 9, 2019 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Snik LLC. (ksd)
October 9, 2019 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Kyle, John)
October 9, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7472272.), filed by Snik LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kyle, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Snik LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Snik LLC
Represented By: John Shepherd Kyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?