Skinner v. Saul
Plaintiff: Ronesha Skinner
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul
Case Number: 6:2020cv00046
Filed: January 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronesha Skinner. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Kelly, Michael)
January 30, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE by Ronesha Skinner Certificate of Interested Persons (Kelly, Michael)
January 30, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Ronesha Skinner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kelly, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Skinner v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronesha Skinner
Represented By: Michael Thomas Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?