Moore v. The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity et al
| Shelia Moore |
| The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity, The Afiya Center and Texas Equal Access Fund |
| 6:2020cv00448 |
| August 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER granting in part #10 Motion to Remand to State Court. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to remand and DENIES Plaintiff's fee request. It is ORDERED that this case be REMANDED to Panola County, Texas. All pending motions in this case are DENIED AS MOOT without prejudice to being reasserted, as necessary, in the state court. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 09/16/20. (mll, )
|
| ***This civil action will be remanded to state court on or after 10-07-2020 per Local Rule CV-83(b)*** (mll, ) |
| Filing 17 SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re #10 Opposed MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Texas Equal Access Fund, The Afiya Center, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit O'Connor Order)(Ecklund, Jennifer) |
| Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 Opposed MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Shelia Moore. (Mitchell, Jonathan) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 Opposed MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Texas Equal Access Fund, The Afiya Center, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ecklund, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle for all further proceedings. District Judge J. Campbell Barker no longer assigned to case. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 08/25/20. (mll, )
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion to extend time to file response to defendants' motion to dismiss #11 . The time to respond to defendants' motion to dismiss is extended until 14 days after the court's ruling on plaintiff's pending motion to remand the case to state court. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 8/25/2020. (ndc)
|
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #11 MOTION to Dismiss by Shelia Moore. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mitchell, Jonathan) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss by Texas Equal Access Fund, The Afiya Center, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ecklund, Jennifer) |
| Filing 10 Opposed MOTION to Remand to State Court by Shelia Moore. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mitchell, Jonathan) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Texas Equal Access Fund, The Afiya Center, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity Notice of Related Cases (Ecklund, Jennifer) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Hartson Dustin Fillmore, III on behalf of Shelia Moore (Fillmore, Hartson) |
| Filing 7 COMPLAINT against Texas Equal Access Fund, The Afiya Center, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity, filed by Shelia Moore. (Filed in state court as "Plaintiff's Original Petition")(mll, ) |
| District Judge J. Campbell Barker added. (mll, ) |
| MINUTE ORDER adopting in this case Judge Barker's standing orders, which may be obtained from his court-website page. Noncompliance with those standing orders may result in a sanction or other disadvantage. (mll, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mll, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by D. Bryan Hughes on behalf of Shelia Moore (Hughes, D.) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan F Mitchell on behalf of Shelia Moore (Mitchell, Jonathan) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Texas Equal Access Fund, The Afiya Center, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity (Ecklund, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Texas Equal Access Fund, The Afiya Center, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity Certificate of Interested Parties and Entities (Ecklund, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 State Court Records Filed by Texas Equal Access Fund, The Afiya Center, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity Index of Documents. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B - State Court Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit C - Original Petition, #3 Exhibit D - Request for Citations, #4 Exhibit E - Citations)(Ecklund, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The Afiya Center, Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity from 123rd District Court, Panola County, Texas, case number 2020-216. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7947441), filed by The Afiya Center, Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Index of Documents, #3 Exhibit B - State Court Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit C - Original Petition, #5 Exhibit D - Request for Citations, #6 Exhibit E - Citations)(Ecklund, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
