Hanon v. Smith et al
Kenneth R Hanon |
ATH Recovery LLC doing business as Majestic Recovery and Jon Michael Smith doing business as Panola Auto Sales |
6:2020cv00533 |
October 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
J Campbell Barker |
K Nicole Mitchell |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to ATH Recovery LLC, Jon Michael Smith, and mailed to plaintiff for service. (mll, ) |
Filing 2 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K Nicole Mitchell. (mll, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ATH Recovery LLC, Jon Michael Smith, filed by Kenneth R Hanon.(mll, ) |
Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number 6-54275 (mll, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. ***MAILED Consent Form to plaintiff. (mll, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Kenneth R Hanon. (mll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.