Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
| Patrick Bernard Smith |
| Director, TDCJ-CID |
| 6:2021cv00032 |
| January 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| K Nicole Mitchell |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 FINAL JUDGMENT. This petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. All pending motions are DENIED as MOOT. The Clerk of Court is instructed to close this case. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 02/16/21. (mll, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court OVERRULES Petitioner's objections #7 and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge #5 as the opinion of the District Court. Petitioner's petition for habeas corpus is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Further, the Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 02/16/21. (mll, )
|
| Filing 7 OBJECTION to #5 Report and Recommendations by Patrick Bernard Smith. (mll, ) |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Patrick Bernard Smith as to #5 Report and Recommendations. Received 1/26/2021. (ndc) |
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is recommended that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied and the case dismissed with prejudice. It is further recommended that a certificate of appealability be denied sua sponte. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 01/21/21. (mll, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 01/21/21. (mll, )
|
| Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K Nicole Mitchell. (mll, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Patrick Bernard Smith. (mll, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Patrick Bernard Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope(s))(mll, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. ***MAILED Consent Form to petitioner. (mll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID | |
| Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Patrick Bernard Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
